Issue 60 - June 2005
The Court of Appeal once again had to consider the size of an appropriate fine following a successful prosecution for Health and Safety offences. See also R v P&O European Ferries (Issue 55)
Other
R v Jarvis Facilities Ltd
Click to download PDFR v P&O European Ferries (RFC Ltd)
Issue 55 - January 2005
How will the court assess the size of an appropriate fine following the successful prosecutionfor health and safety offences?
King v Richard Farmer (t/a RW Farmer (Builders))
Issue 52 - October 2004
Which party controlled the way in which work was carried out on site?
Michael Humpheryes v Ledcon UK Ltd and Storage Engineering Services
Issue 50 - August 2004
Here, in a personal injury claim for injuries caused by tripping on floor studs at a construction site, the Court had to decide who was in control and responsible for that site.
Gemma Ltd v Gimson and anr
Issue 50 - August 2004
HHJ Thornton QC provides guidance on the amount of money likely to be ordered in a claim for damages for inconvenience, loss and anxiety.
Contact the editor
Subscribe to our newsletters
If you would like to receive a digital version of our newsletters please complete the subscription form.